CLASSIFICATION
Swallow ID:
1260
Partner Institution:
Concordia University
Source Collection Label:
SGWU Reading Series-Concordia University Department of English fonds
Series:
The Poetry Series
Sub Series:
SGWU Reading Series-Concordia University Department of English fonds
ITEM DESCRIPTION
Title:
Robert Creeley at Sir George Williams University, The Poetry Series, 24 February 1967
Title Source:
Cataloguer
Title Note:
"ROBERT CREELEY I006/SR89.1" written on sticker on the spine of the tape's box. I006-11-089.1 is written on a sticker on the tape reel
Language:
English
Production Context:
Documentary recording
Genre:
Reading: Poetry
Identifiers:
[]
Rights
CREATORS
Name:
Creeley, Robert
Dates:
1926-2005
Role:
"Performer",
"Author"
Notes:
American poet and essayist Robert Creeley was born in 1926 in Arlington, Massachusetts. His early life was marred by tragedy, as he lost his left eye in an accident and suffered the death of his father when he was four years old. Creeley then grew up on a farm, and felt repressed by his traditional Puritanical New England upbringing. After a year of Harvard University, Creeley joined the US Field Service in India and Burma. Returning again to Harvard, he married his first wife Ann MacKinnon, with whom he had three children, only to leave Harvard in his final semester. From 1948 to 1950, Creeley and his family moved to several locations including Provincetown, New Hampshire; Provenance, France; and Mallorca, Spain. Once in Mallorca, he set up The Divers Press with poet Denise Levertov. Creeley thus began correspondence with Charles Olson, and Olson offered Creeley a teaching position at the Black Mountain College in North Carolina, as well as a Bachelor’s degree in 1954. During his short time at Black Mountain, Creely edited Black Mountain Review, a journal known for its experimental writing. As well as many publications in poetry magazines, he published his first collection of short stories in The Gold Diggers in 1954 (Divers Press). After his marriage dissolved, Creeley headed West to San Francisco, meeting with Allen Ginsberg, Gary Snyder, and Kenneth Rexroth, as well as other Beat poets during the San Francisco Poetry Renaissance. Creeley then moved to Albuquerque, New Mexico, completed his M.A., and then took a position as professor of English. There, he met and married Bobbie Louise Hall, with whom he had two daughters and for whom he wrote most of his love poetry. His first major collection of poetry was For Love: Poems 1950-1960, published in 1962 (Scribner Press). Creeley subsequently published his novel, The Island (Scribner Press, 1963), and other poetry collections including Words (Scribner), The Charm: Early and Uncollected Poems (Perishable Press, 1967), and Pieces (Scribner, 1969). His essays and prose publications include A Quick Graph: Collected Notes and Essays (Four Seasons Foundation, 1970), A Sense of Measure (Calder and Boyars, 1973), and Was That a Real Poem and Other Essays (Four Seasons Foundation, 1979). His marriage with Bobbie ended in the late 70’s, and he married his third wife, Penelope Highton. Creeley continued to publish his poetry in collections such as Later (New Directions, 1979), Mirrors (New Directions, 1983), Windows (New Directions, 1990), Echoes (New Directions, 1994), Life and Death (New Directions, 1998), and If I Were Writing This (New Directions, 2003). He has won a number of awards and honors, including the New York State Poet Laureate from 1989-91. He was elected a Chancellor of the Academy of American Poets in 1999, received the Lannan Lifetime Achievement Award, the Bollingen Prize, the Shelley Memorial Award, a Rockefeller Grant and two Guggenheim Fellowships. Robert Creeley died in 2005, but his poetry has been published posthumously in On Earth: Last Poems and an Essay (University of California Press, 2009), The Collected Poems of Robert Creeley, 1975-2005 (University of California Press, 2006) and Robert Creeley: Selected Poems, 1945-2005 (University of California Press, 2008).
CONTRIBUTORS
Name:
Layton, Irving
Dates:
1912-2006
Role:
"Presenter"
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Recording Type:
Analogue
AV Type:
Audio
Material Designation:
Reel to Reel
Physical Composition:
Magnetic Tape
Storage Capacity:
Tape
Extent:
1/4 inch
Track Configuration:
2 track
Playback Mode:
Mono
Tape Brand:
Scotch
Sound Quality:
Good
DIGITAL FILE DESCRIPTION
File Path:
files.spokenweb.ca>concordia>sgw>audio>all_mp3
Duration:
01:23:12
Size:
199.7 MB
Content:
Irving Layton
00:00:15
Mr. Creeley
has published too many books for me to list for you this evening, but some titles are deserving of notice. His Collected Poems was published by Scriveners in 1962 under the title For Love. He has also published short stories and they're brought out by Scriveners after first being published, privately I believe, under the title of The Gold Diggers. His most recent book, also brought out by Scriveners, is called Words. Mr. Creeley has a style that is unique and inimitable. There are many, both in this country
and in United States of America
that are trying to capture the delicate, tenuous quality of his work, and not quite successfully. For his is an art of pauses, of hesitations. He affirms by diffidence, and he destroys our pretensions with a whisper. He uses silence as a modern composer of music [unintelligible], or the way a contemporary painter uses space. He bounces words off against the wall of [unintelligible]. If you listen carefully, you'll hear reverberations and the subtlest of echoes. Mr. Creeley is one of the most honest poets writing today. And a very brave man, who knows the price that has to be paid for a good poem certified to endure. He has written a little song, sing days of happiness, make a pardonable wonder of one's blunders. The man who wrote those words knows all that needs to be known about the perilous vocation of the poet. One critic has said his poems are miniatures, but then hastened to add that they are not miniatures, sorry-One critic has said-this is not from memory-One critic has said that his poems are miniatures, but there's nothing miniature about the power that they release. I have said somewhere that he has written skinny poems, that miraculously grow in length and breath, one's air absorbed into one's consciousness. Slender firecrackers that explode with the power of a bomb. Ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Robert Creeley.
Audience
00:03:42
Applause.
Robert Creeley
00:03:52
See now, it's extremely generous, Irving
, all that. No, because we have had a very long association. I think I'd like to say my piece too, apropos that fact that I think that the kind of community that say either Irving or myself in this way were involved with was what kinds of, no really, how could you find the world? I mean, I, for example first read his poems in the collection called Cerberus with Louis Dudek
and Raymond Souster
and then I was very interested in the magazine that they had going called Contact, I was looking for connections I suppose, the man, in no hips sense, but we were, I was extraordinar--I wanted to know where the world was, and Irving seemed to be very much, very much part of any world I certainly could respect. And so, what he generously and definitely himself ignores was that he was that he was a very decisive contributing editor for the Black Mountain Review, and it was really, a very decisive friend all those fifteen years he imagines. Let me read now. Let me start from back then, "A Song".
Robert Creeley
00:05:47
Reads "A Song" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:06:37
This is apropos. "The Conspiracy".
Robert Creeley
00:06:43
Reads "The Conspiracy" [from For Love].
Audience
00:07:11
Laughter.
Robert Creeley
00:07:12
That was no joke. "Chanson".
Robert Creeley
00:07:26
Reads "Chanson" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:08:00
"The Operation".
Robert Creeley
00:08:05
Reads "The Operation" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:08:35
"The Death of Venus".
Robert Creeley
00:08:41
Reads "The Death of Venus" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:09:17
I was thinking Paul Blackburn
happily has been here, so this is a poem, again of the same, the same situation that we were very active in the exchange of, I mean, again I want to emphasize the sense that we were looking around to see what kinds of possibility that we could find in the world and I suppose if we shared anything, I was thinking of Irving's lovely stories and letters about the problems of visiting literary parties [laughs] and partly being forbidden because he made such awkward problems for guests and hosts, etc. So that Paul Blackburn at this point was translating from Provencal poetry, he'd been at the University of Wisconsin
and had had a very active and useful relation with the woman there, I think it was, teaching Provencal, so that he'd also been very involved with Pound
, with Pound's senses of activity in verse and had therefore become particularly interested in Provencal and had begun to translate, and through the same agency that we had in Mallorca
, my wife and I then, the so called Divers Press that had published Irving's book, we published a collection of Paul's Provencal translations called Proensa. So the title, is actually Paul's title, I can't now remember what- I don't think he ever published the poem it was the title for, but I was struck by it, and you know, you take things, obviously from friends, it was that you were stealing, but that it was always a common situation. It's a form of adaptation, and I think a young friend now at Buffalo
were presently working was telling me that I am in the courtly tradition which is confusing to me, but I can see what he means simply that did pick up a lot through Paul Blackburn and writers in this way using a vocabulary or sense of possibility involved with that kind of writing. So this poem, for example, would be, would be actually a, would be a poem not written by Paul Blackburn, but a poem much informed by his way of perceiving. "A Form of Adaptation".
Robert Creeley
00:11:46
Reads "A Form of Adaptation" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:12:40
“The Whip”.
Robert Creeley
00:12:43
Reads "The Whip" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:13:29
"Please".
Robert Creeley
00:13:36
Reads "Please" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:14:36
"The Three Ladies".
Robert Creeley
00:14:39
Reads "The Three Ladies" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:16:04
[Unintelligible] "New Year’s".
Robert Creeley
00:16:17
Reads "New Year’s" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:17:34
"Entre Nous".
Robert Creeley
00:17:40
Reads "Entre Nous" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:18:08
"The Place".
Robert Creeley
00:18:11
Reads "The Place" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:19:20
"The Hill".
Robert Creeley
00:19:32
Reads "The Hill" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:20:21
"The Awakening" for Charles Olson
.
Robert Creeley
00:20:25
Reads "The Awakening" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:22:04
"The Rain".
Robert Creeley
00:22:12
Reads "The Rain" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:23:12
"Kore".
Robert Creeley
00:23:20
Reads "Kore" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:24:09
I thought I'd read a few more of these in this particular collection. Zukofsky
is a man I very much respect. "The House", for Louis Zukofsky.
Robert Creeley
00:24:29
Reads "The House" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:25:06
"The Pool".
Robert Creeley
00:25:13
Reads "The Pool" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:26:18
Water, I really love water. To Water.
Robert Creeley
00:26:26
Reads "The Rocks" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
00:27:47
"The Fire".
Robert Creeley
00:27:50
Reads "The Fire" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
00:28:31
"Something".
Robert Creeley
00:28:37
Reads "Something” [from Words].
Robert Creeley
00:29:46
That was a, there's another poem with that same sense, no really, I'm very, I think that some of the lovely incongruities of existence [unintelligible] Charlotte- whose last name I can't remember, [unintelligible] like to say was arrested in New York for trying to, as she put it, and I believe, lovely innocence, she wanted to have chamber music as quote sexy unquote as other life circumstances seemed to be becoming, so that she was playing something like [unintelligible] or Bach
in topless condition and was arrested by a very discreet policeman and taken away. Although she wanted apparently to entertain the sight as well as the ear. I don't know, I mean, why shouldn't she be permitted to do that? "Distance".
Robert Creeley
00:31:03
Reads "Distance" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
00:34:29
A couple of these, two from Mexico
. "The Window".
Robert Creeley
00:34:36
Reads "The Window" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
00:35:30
"To Bobbie".
Robert Creeley
00:35:34
Reads "To Bobbie" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
00:36:46
I wanna, there's one poem, apropos I'd like to go back to, a couple--"The Rose".
Robert Creeley
00:37:02
Reads "The Rose" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:38:46
"Love Comes Quietly".
Robert Creeley
00:38:53
Reads "Love Comes Quietly" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:39:15
"The Gesture".
Robert Creeley
00:39:21
Reads "The Gesture" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:39:52
"For Love".
Robert Creeley
00:39:56
Reads "For Love" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:42:39
I want to go back to this one. There's one... called, "Anger". This interpolates, so to speak of. I've been traveling in an extraordinary company of people the last, or the week previous and then, we'll see them again at the same activity tomorrow night in New York
. We were billed as quote contemporary voices in the arts, unquote, but apart from that the, we were visiting various colleges and universities in the Upstate New York area from say Albany State
to Rensselaer Polytechnic
to Potsdam
, and then places St Lawrence
or Union College
and we were trying, in effect, to- we had the problem of we were billed as a panel, seven men, sitting down to discuss- John Cage
is one of the participants, and he said, 'well', of course if we sit down, we say, 'well where do you think art is going?' and then you have to figure out where do you think art's come from? [laughter] And at that point you just might as well come home because it's going to be a long, long conversation. So we decided that we would, instead of having the formal sense of panel, that we would simply create, improvise, or go about in effect at our own activity, except that we wouldn't isolate ourselves in that but would simply try to improvise, as we were seven people, a poem that could permit each one of us to be active, all together so that we at no point had much- we had no decision as to what the others would be doing, so that the whole activity occurred as the complex, and I was- I mean, I had never had any experience of this kind previously at all, John Cage had made, oh very large decisions indeed about this kind of possibility in music, simply that he wanted all possibility of sound to be admitted into the context that music proposes. He also had very decisive relation to what are called loosely 'happenings', and both he and Merce Cunningham
, another participant, had in that with some previous experience, but the point is that they weren't- neither was trying to create a system from previous experience, but again was trying to think of how this activity of seven people could be evident in ways that simply didn't create a three-ring circus but was actually a participation so, I was intrigued, I was extraordinarily intrigued as to how words, as poetry and whatnot could enter into this circumstance, and because I literally was in it, I have in a sense no quote objective unquote experience at all, but it was extraordinary to me to hear how things are heard in a multiple, in a multiple event, rather than the kind of singularity that this occasion proposes. So I still have that on my mind in a way, and I may, I really do feel that say, all the arts, I mean if one does want some kind of statement about them, that all the arts are moving into a situation where the agency is becoming less and less singular, I don't mean necessarily that in some seminal sense, that everyone's quote an artist, I mean I don't know what an artist is, in one way at all, but I think that the participation is becoming much more a situation of process and activity, and that it is becoming less and less evident as one singular isolation of person, and I realize in my own writing how much the previous condition had been my, my occasion. So, I may be reading these poems for the last time in that sense. I'm certainly prepared to do so, I'm not at all interested in continuing an activity that maybe, you know, maybe have much more experience or much more range of possibility than say contemporary habits about it seem to imply. But anyhow, that was interesting to me to have that experience and also interesting of course is what it had as an impact on educational process. Immediately this activity finished and I've never been in such a- I mean I've been, you know, like they say in [unintelligible] auditorium in the summer, I certainly have seen light shows and other [unintelligible] happenings, a few years ago, it was Roy Kiyooka
, knows, having been there also, there was an extraordinary happening like they say put on by the Tate Music Center from San Francisco
[unintelligible] being the painter doing the so called decor, doing the set, the set that was used, creating the visual. But this other thing was something quite distinct, simply that each person was so active in ways that he couldn't anticipate and we had with us also Billy Kluver
, who can be most easily identified as the man who, is literally is an Engineer at Bell Labs
in New Jersey
who engineered the 9 Evenings
of the Armory [Hall (?)] in company with Rauschenberg
, [Vergan (?)] and Cage
and others, a situation that brought technology into close apropos with the arts, and led to the practical effects of this activity are very evident, it led to ten patented inventions, all of which have much more extensive use, let's say than that occasion of those particular evenings. That was [unintelligible] you know, many, many poets [unintelligible] of this kind, that is, it turns out that when the arts are permitted this situation, that, I think we were talking to Irving earlier this evening, I think we both fear a situation, or have some kind of, feeling of personal awkwardness about a situation that is turning to the arts as if the arts had a necessary message or condition of life to stake for people to have use of, I mean, again, in these evenings we were round in these colleges, I mean the students or the people present, again and again said that "what were you trying to tell us?" And the point was that we weren't trying to tell them anything. We were in fact, we thought, that the activity was something which each person could have experienced, it would be like going to the beach and saying what do you think the water is trying to tell us? [audience laughter.] And you stand there, you're swimming [unintelligible] for two hours enjoying yourself thoroughly and then you come out and say to your friend, but what did it all mean? You know, we assumed that the people there would have some - would have some decision of their own, you know, did you think it was too cold, or too hot, or did you enjoy it, or you know, that's the kind of question no one can answer for you. In any case, I do feel the arts has, as Irving feels also, are being turned to, as some possibility of decision in contemporary society and don't think they can offer that ever, I don't- I think the very value of the arts is that they have no conclusion of this kind to propose, that what they do give is something I think perhaps Pound puts as ably as anyone when he says that "art is the antenna of the race". It's a very large statement obviously, and I think what he proposes in it is perhaps even can be put more simply in that the arts tend to experience the condition of the society that is, in a sense, and that way I have use of the condition of the society, perhaps more immediately than any other definition or activity in the society, I mean they tend to respond to the present condition perhaps more decisively than any other segment, I mean everyone else tends, not- I don't mean this in any put down sense of their attitudes in this society but I mean, that as the war goes on because it's an historical precedent and so on and so forth, I mean people continued to act as though what they were doing is still what they are doing, what they are doing is still what they were doing and they literally tend to continue in those habits of attitude or activity until something simply makes them impossible, but the arts tend to have experience I think of present condition, that they have no other viable occasion, they tend to propose what the immediate experience of say any life situation simply is, but they have no instruction therefore offer except that is possible, so that as I say, if poetry, as we've now experienced it is about to yield to another situation that is if books or printed medium of this order are to be changed, in societal experience, great, I mean I don't see why I want you to have to carry around all these pieces of paper, there must be, I'm sure that there's a simple way to communicate this kind of content but I do want to make the insistence that these poems or what I'm doing here has- I mean, I'm enjoying this, I'd probably do this even if you weren't here. [audience laughter], obviously did do it, you know. Now this is something else again, I had no messages, if the media is the message, this is perhaps the most absolute demonstration you'll probably get. "Anger".
Robert Creeley
00:54:01
Reads "Anger" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
00:59:25
I'd like if people are feeling reasonably restless, I'd like to read one or two more poems and then one more story to make a selection frankly [unintelligible] I think I'll see what would be useful. A couple of shorter poems for the end. One called "A Tally".
Robert Creeley
01:00:01
Reads "A Tally" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
01:01:41
"Enough".
Robert Creeley
01:01:45
Reads "Enough" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
01:06:00
One last poem I want to read now, [unintelligible] "The Hole".
Robert Creeley
01:06:07
Reads "The Hole" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
01:07:53
Read a story that's in effect going back some time to the time of the writing of the Island, a novel. And I hadn't written any prose for some time, not since the middle 50's and I had a [joke (?)], myself and my wife and our four kids were all down in Guatemala
where I was tutoring children on a coffee plantation, and having that kind of isolation and time that seemed to, you know, have the possibility to try some prose. I like prose simply that it has--it's continuous, it permits a kind of variety of activity in ways that sometimes poetry from my own experience, at least in the way I'm given to write it, doesn't altogether- I mean, the emotional demand, let's say in a poem is in my own experience has known it, is of such order that alternatives in a curious way aren't possible, you simply say what you're thus brought to say as best you can. In prose, the emotional so called situation tends to be more various, it goes up, down, it ebbs, flows, re-forms, changes its mind, and so on and so forth, so I--not in recent years, I think the last prose I wrote was this novel, called the Island and I've not really written any since, that's about--when I was in Vancouver
teaching I finished that novel, and that was the last prose I think I've written and hopefully won't--I would like to go back to prose for a time. I'd like to have it open, I mean, again, this experience of being with these particular people, whenever habits become, oh let's say whenever you expect everything to be as you have experienced, it's time to look out or do something else because it means that you're assuming of the reality of your life has become too much of a pattern of a habit. Anyhow, this is a story called "The Book". I sort of like this story.
Robert Creeley
01:10:22
Reads "The Book".
Robert Creeley
01:21:15
Thank you very much for your...
Audience
01:21:16
Applause.
Introducer
01:21:39
I think I speak for everyone in thanking Robert Creeley for being able to come down and make the scene tonight. There are a couple of announcements that I want to make, the first one I can't remember so I'll have to [unintelligible], [Audrey Brunet (?)], that I do remember invites everyone to come to hear "Prayers on the Periphery", an original reading, this coming Monday, March the 6th at 8:30 pm in the little gallery on the mezzanine. Our next reading is a week from now, next Friday, March the 3rd, and Victor Coleman
and George Bowering
from Buffalo
and Toronto
will be coming. Thank you.
Audience
01:22:32
Applause.
Unknown
01:22:45
[Cut or edit made in tape].
Robert Creeley
01:22:48
Reads “The Book” [repeated from 00:27:43].
END
01:23:12
Notes:
Robert Creeley reads from For Love (Scribner, 1962) and Words (Scribner, 1967).
I006-11-089.1=AC.1
00:15- Irving Layton introduces Robert Creeley [INDEX: Irving Layton, Collected Poems Scriveners Press 1962, For Love, The Gold Diggers, Words by Robert Creeley]
03:52- Robert Creeley responds to Layton’s introduction and introduces “A Song”. [INDEX: Cerberus, Contact Magazine, Louis Dudek, Raymond Souster, Irving Layton as editor for Black Mountain Review]
05:47- Reads “A Song”
06:37- Reads “The Conspiracy”
07:12- Reads “Chanson”
08:00- Reads “The Operation”
08:35- Reads “The Death of Venus”
09:17- Introduces “A Form of Adaptation”. [INDEX: Paul Blackburn, University of Wisconsin, Divers Press, Irving Layton, Provencal Poetry, Ezra Pound, Mallorca, Proensa by Paul Blackburn.]
11:46- Reads “A Form of Adaptation”
12:40- Reads “The Whip”
13:29- Reads “Please”
14:36- Reads “The Three Ladies”
16:04- Reads “New Year’s”
17:34- Reads “Entre-Nous”
18:08- Reads “The Place”
19:20- Reads “The Hill”
20:21- Reads “The Awakening” [INDEX: Charles Olson]
22:04- Reads “The Rain”
23:12- Reads “Kore”
24:09- Introduces “The House” [INDEX: Louis Zukofsky]
24:29- Reads “The House”
25:06- Reads “The Pool”
26:18- Reads “To Water”
27:47- Reads “The Fire”
28:31- Reads “Something”
29:46- Introduces “Distance” [INDEX: New York, Bach]
31:03- Reads “Distance”
34:29- Introduces “The Window”
34:36- Reads “The Window”
35:30- Reads “To Bobby”
36:46- Reads “The Rose”
38:46- Reads “Love Comes Quietly”
39:25- Reads “The Gesture”
39:52- Reads “For Love”
42:39.23- END OF RECORDING
I006-11-089.1= AC2
00:00- Robert Creeley introduces “Anger” and talks about the state of art and poetry [INDEX: Upstate New York, Albany State University, Rensselaer Polytechnic, Pottsdam, St. Lawrence College, Union College- Part of Reading Series of seven artists with John Cage, Merce Cunningham. Roy Kiyooka at the Tate Music Center in San Francisco. Billy Kluver from Bell Labs in New Jersey, engineered “9 Evenings” at the Armory Hall with Rauschenberg, [Vergan (?) ] and John Cage. Technology and art, purpose of art, Ezra Pound.]
11:21- Reads “Anger”
16:46- Reads “A Tally”
19:02- Reads “Enough”
23:21- Reads “The Hole”
25:14- Introduces short story “The Book”. [INDEX: Prose, middle 50’s, Guatemala (teaching children on a coffee plantation), writing poetry vs. prose, Vancouver, Island by Robert Creeley.]
27:43- Reads “The Book”
38:59- Unknown male thanks Robert Creeley, makes announcements. [INDEX: Audrey Brunet [?] “Prayers on the Periphery” on March 6th. Victor Coleman and George Bowering from Buffalo and Toronto reading on March 3rd.]
40:32- END OF RECORDING.
Content Type:
Sound Recording
Featured:
Yes
File Path:
My Drive>Sir George Williams TIme-Stamped Transcripts>Spokenweb Tape Case Photos taken by Drew Bernet
Title:
Robert Creeley Tape Box 1 - Back
Credit:
Drew Bernet
Content Type:
Photograph
File Path:
My Drive>Sir George Williams TIme-Stamped Transcripts>Spokenweb Tape Case Photos taken by Drew Bernet
Title:
Robert Creeley Tape Box 1 - Front
Credit:
Drew Bernet
Content Type:
Photograph
File Path:
My Drive>Sir George Williams TIme-Stamped Transcripts>Spokenweb Tape Case Photos taken by Drew Bernet
Title:
Robert Creeley Tape Box 1 - Spine
Credit:
Drew Bernet
Content Type:
Photograph
File Path:
My Drive>Sir George Williams TIme-Stamped Transcripts>Spokenweb Tape Case Photos taken by Drew Bernet
Title:
Robert Creeley Tape Box 1 - Reel
Credit:
Drew Bernet
Content Type:
Photograph
Dates
Date:
1967 2 24
Type:
Performance Date
Source:
Supplemental Material
Notes:
Date specified in "Georgantics"
LOCATION
Address:
1455, Boul de Maisonneuve Ouest, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Venue:
Hall Building Basement Theatre
Latitude:
45.4972758
Longitude:
-73.57893043
Notes:
Location specified in printed announcement "Georgantics" (Supplemental material)
CONTENT
Contents:
robert_creeley_i006-11-089-1_1987.mp3
Irving Layton
00:00:15
Mr. Creeley
has published too many books for me to list for you this evening, but some titles are deserving of notice. His Collected Poems was published by Scriveners in 1962 under the title For Love. He has also published short stories and they're brought out by Scriveners after first being published, privately I believe, under the title of The Gold Diggers. His most recent book, also brought out by Scriveners, is called Words. Mr. Creeley has a style that is unique and inimitable. There are many, both in this country
and in United States of America
that are trying to capture the delicate, tenuous quality of his work, and not quite successfully. For his is an art of pauses, of hesitations. He affirms by diffidence, and he destroys our pretensions with a whisper. He uses silence as a modern composer of music [unintelligible], or the way a contemporary painter uses space. He bounces words off against the wall of [unintelligible]. If you listen carefully, you'll hear reverberations and the subtlest of echoes. Mr. Creeley is one of the most honest poets writing today. And a very brave man, who knows the price that has to be paid for a good poem certified to endure. He has written a little song, sing days of happiness, make a pardonable wonder of one's blunders. The man who wrote those words knows all that needs to be known about the perilous vocation of the poet. One critic has said his poems are miniatures, but then hastened to add that they are not miniatures, sorry-One critic has said-this is not from memory-One critic has said that his poems are miniatures, but there's nothing miniature about the power that they release. I have said somewhere that he has written skinny poems, that miraculously grow in length and breath, one's air absorbed into one's consciousness. Slender firecrackers that explode with the power of a bomb. Ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Robert Creeley.
Audience
00:03:42
Applause.
Robert Creeley
00:03:52
See now, it's extremely generous, Irving
, all that. No, because we have had a very long association. I think I'd like to say my piece too, apropos that fact that I think that the kind of community that say either Irving or myself in this way were involved with was what kinds of, no really, how could you find the world? I mean, I, for example first read his poems in the collection called Cerberus with Louis Dudek
and Raymond Souster
and then I was very interested in the magazine that they had going called Contact, I was looking for connections I suppose, the man, in no hips sense, but we were, I was extraordinar--I wanted to know where the world was, and Irving seemed to be very much, very much part of any world I certainly could respect. And so, what he generously and definitely himself ignores was that he was that he was a very decisive contributing editor for the Black Mountain Review, and it was really, a very decisive friend all those fifteen years he imagines. Let me read now. Let me start from back then, "A Song".
Robert Creeley
00:05:47
Reads "A Song" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:06:37
This is apropos. "The Conspiracy".
Robert Creeley
00:06:43
Reads "The Conspiracy" [from For Love].
Audience
00:07:11
Laughter.
Robert Creeley
00:07:12
That was no joke. "Chanson".
Robert Creeley
00:07:26
Reads "Chanson" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:08:00
"The Operation".
Robert Creeley
00:08:05
Reads "The Operation" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:08:35
"The Death of Venus".
Robert Creeley
00:08:41
Reads "The Death of Venus" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:09:17
I was thinking Paul Blackburn
happily has been here, so this is a poem, again of the same, the same situation that we were very active in the exchange of, I mean, again I want to emphasize the sense that we were looking around to see what kinds of possibility that we could find in the world and I suppose if we shared anything, I was thinking of Irving's lovely stories and letters about the problems of visiting literary parties [laughs] and partly being forbidden because he made such awkward problems for guests and hosts, etc. So that Paul Blackburn at this point was translating from Provencal poetry, he'd been at the University of Wisconsin
and had had a very active and useful relation with the woman there, I think it was, teaching Provencal, so that he'd also been very involved with Pound
, with Pound's senses of activity in verse and had therefore become particularly interested in Provencal and had begun to translate, and through the same agency that we had in Mallorca
, my wife and I then, the so called Divers Press that had published Irving's book, we published a collection of Paul's Provencal translations called Proensa. So the title, is actually Paul's title, I can't now remember what- I don't think he ever published the poem it was the title for, but I was struck by it, and you know, you take things, obviously from friends, it was that you were stealing, but that it was always a common situation. It's a form of adaptation, and I think a young friend now at Buffalo
were presently working was telling me that I am in the courtly tradition which is confusing to me, but I can see what he means simply that did pick up a lot through Paul Blackburn and writers in this way using a vocabulary or sense of possibility involved with that kind of writing. So this poem, for example, would be, would be actually a, would be a poem not written by Paul Blackburn, but a poem much informed by his way of perceiving. "A Form of Adaptation".
Robert Creeley
00:11:46
Reads "A Form of Adaptation" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:12:40
“The Whip”.
Robert Creeley
00:12:43
Reads "The Whip" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:13:29
"Please".
Robert Creeley
00:13:36
Reads "Please" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:14:36
"The Three Ladies".
Robert Creeley
00:14:39
Reads "The Three Ladies" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:16:04
[Unintelligible] "New Year’s".
Robert Creeley
00:16:17
Reads "New Year’s" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:17:34
"Entre Nous".
Robert Creeley
00:17:40
Reads "Entre Nous" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:18:08
"The Place".
Robert Creeley
00:18:11
Reads "The Place" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:19:20
"The Hill".
Robert Creeley
00:19:32
Reads "The Hill" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:20:21
"The Awakening" for Charles Olson
.
Robert Creeley
00:20:25
Reads "The Awakening" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:22:04
"The Rain".
Robert Creeley
00:22:12
Reads "The Rain" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:23:12
"Kore".
Robert Creeley
00:23:20
Reads "Kore" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:24:09
I thought I'd read a few more of these in this particular collection. Zukofsky
is a man I very much respect. "The House", for Louis Zukofsky.
Robert Creeley
00:24:29
Reads "The House" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:25:06
"The Pool".
Robert Creeley
00:25:13
Reads "The Pool" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:26:18
Water, I really love water. To Water.
Robert Creeley
00:26:26
Reads "The Rocks" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
00:27:47
"The Fire".
Robert Creeley
00:27:50
Reads "The Fire" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
00:28:31
"Something".
Robert Creeley
00:28:37
Reads "Something” [from Words].
Robert Creeley
00:29:46
That was a, there's another poem with that same sense, no really, I'm very, I think that some of the lovely incongruities of existence [unintelligible] Charlotte- whose last name I can't remember, [unintelligible] like to say was arrested in New York for trying to, as she put it, and I believe, lovely innocence, she wanted to have chamber music as quote sexy unquote as other life circumstances seemed to be becoming, so that she was playing something like [unintelligible] or Bach
in topless condition and was arrested by a very discreet policeman and taken away. Although she wanted apparently to entertain the sight as well as the ear. I don't know, I mean, why shouldn't she be permitted to do that? "Distance".
Robert Creeley
00:31:03
Reads "Distance" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
00:34:29
A couple of these, two from Mexico
. "The Window".
Robert Creeley
00:34:36
Reads "The Window" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
00:35:30
"To Bobbie".
Robert Creeley
00:35:34
Reads "To Bobbie" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
00:36:46
I wanna, there's one poem, apropos I'd like to go back to, a couple--"The Rose".
Robert Creeley
00:37:02
Reads "The Rose" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:38:46
"Love Comes Quietly".
Robert Creeley
00:38:53
Reads "Love Comes Quietly" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:39:15
"The Gesture".
Robert Creeley
00:39:21
Reads "The Gesture" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:39:52
"For Love".
Robert Creeley
00:39:56
Reads "For Love" [from For Love].
Robert Creeley
00:42:39
I want to go back to this one. There's one... called, "Anger". This interpolates, so to speak of. I've been traveling in an extraordinary company of people the last, or the week previous and then, we'll see them again at the same activity tomorrow night in New York
. We were billed as quote contemporary voices in the arts, unquote, but apart from that the, we were visiting various colleges and universities in the Upstate New York area from say Albany State
to Rensselaer Polytechnic
to Potsdam
, and then places St Lawrence
or Union College
and we were trying, in effect, to- we had the problem of we were billed as a panel, seven men, sitting down to discuss- John Cage
is one of the participants, and he said, 'well', of course if we sit down, we say, 'well where do you think art is going?' and then you have to figure out where do you think art's come from? [laughter] And at that point you just might as well come home because it's going to be a long, long conversation. So we decided that we would, instead of having the formal sense of panel, that we would simply create, improvise, or go about in effect at our own activity, except that we wouldn't isolate ourselves in that but would simply try to improvise, as we were seven people, a poem that could permit each one of us to be active, all together so that we at no point had much- we had no decision as to what the others would be doing, so that the whole activity occurred as the complex, and I was- I mean, I had never had any experience of this kind previously at all, John Cage had made, oh very large decisions indeed about this kind of possibility in music, simply that he wanted all possibility of sound to be admitted into the context that music proposes. He also had very decisive relation to what are called loosely 'happenings', and both he and Merce Cunningham
, another participant, had in that with some previous experience, but the point is that they weren't- neither was trying to create a system from previous experience, but again was trying to think of how this activity of seven people could be evident in ways that simply didn't create a three-ring circus but was actually a participation so, I was intrigued, I was extraordinarily intrigued as to how words, as poetry and whatnot could enter into this circumstance, and because I literally was in it, I have in a sense no quote objective unquote experience at all, but it was extraordinary to me to hear how things are heard in a multiple, in a multiple event, rather than the kind of singularity that this occasion proposes. So I still have that on my mind in a way, and I may, I really do feel that say, all the arts, I mean if one does want some kind of statement about them, that all the arts are moving into a situation where the agency is becoming less and less singular, I don't mean necessarily that in some seminal sense, that everyone's quote an artist, I mean I don't know what an artist is, in one way at all, but I think that the participation is becoming much more a situation of process and activity, and that it is becoming less and less evident as one singular isolation of person, and I realize in my own writing how much the previous condition had been my, my occasion. So, I may be reading these poems for the last time in that sense. I'm certainly prepared to do so, I'm not at all interested in continuing an activity that maybe, you know, maybe have much more experience or much more range of possibility than say contemporary habits about it seem to imply. But anyhow, that was interesting to me to have that experience and also interesting of course is what it had as an impact on educational process. Immediately this activity finished and I've never been in such a- I mean I've been, you know, like they say in [unintelligible] auditorium in the summer, I certainly have seen light shows and other [unintelligible] happenings, a few years ago, it was Roy Kiyooka
, knows, having been there also, there was an extraordinary happening like they say put on by the Tate Music Center from San Francisco
[unintelligible] being the painter doing the so called decor, doing the set, the set that was used, creating the visual. But this other thing was something quite distinct, simply that each person was so active in ways that he couldn't anticipate and we had with us also Billy Kluver
, who can be most easily identified as the man who, is literally is an Engineer at Bell Labs
in New Jersey
who engineered the 9 Evenings
of the Armory [Hall (?)] in company with Rauschenberg
, [Vergan (?)] and Cage
and others, a situation that brought technology into close apropos with the arts, and led to the practical effects of this activity are very evident, it led to ten patented inventions, all of which have much more extensive use, let's say than that occasion of those particular evenings. That was [unintelligible] you know, many, many poets [unintelligible] of this kind, that is, it turns out that when the arts are permitted this situation, that, I think we were talking to Irving earlier this evening, I think we both fear a situation, or have some kind of, feeling of personal awkwardness about a situation that is turning to the arts as if the arts had a necessary message or condition of life to stake for people to have use of, I mean, again, in these evenings we were round in these colleges, I mean the students or the people present, again and again said that "what were you trying to tell us?" And the point was that we weren't trying to tell them anything. We were in fact, we thought, that the activity was something which each person could have experienced, it would be like going to the beach and saying what do you think the water is trying to tell us? [audience laughter.] And you stand there, you're swimming [unintelligible] for two hours enjoying yourself thoroughly and then you come out and say to your friend, but what did it all mean? You know, we assumed that the people there would have some - would have some decision of their own, you know, did you think it was too cold, or too hot, or did you enjoy it, or you know, that's the kind of question no one can answer for you. In any case, I do feel the arts has, as Irving feels also, are being turned to, as some possibility of decision in contemporary society and don't think they can offer that ever, I don't- I think the very value of the arts is that they have no conclusion of this kind to propose, that what they do give is something I think perhaps Pound puts as ably as anyone when he says that "art is the antenna of the race". It's a very large statement obviously, and I think what he proposes in it is perhaps even can be put more simply in that the arts tend to experience the condition of the society that is, in a sense, and that way I have use of the condition of the society, perhaps more immediately than any other definition or activity in the society, I mean they tend to respond to the present condition perhaps more decisively than any other segment, I mean everyone else tends, not- I don't mean this in any put down sense of their attitudes in this society but I mean, that as the war goes on because it's an historical precedent and so on and so forth, I mean people continued to act as though what they were doing is still what they are doing, what they are doing is still what they were doing and they literally tend to continue in those habits of attitude or activity until something simply makes them impossible, but the arts tend to have experience I think of present condition, that they have no other viable occasion, they tend to propose what the immediate experience of say any life situation simply is, but they have no instruction therefore offer except that is possible, so that as I say, if poetry, as we've now experienced it is about to yield to another situation that is if books or printed medium of this order are to be changed, in societal experience, great, I mean I don't see why I want you to have to carry around all these pieces of paper, there must be, I'm sure that there's a simple way to communicate this kind of content but I do want to make the insistence that these poems or what I'm doing here has- I mean, I'm enjoying this, I'd probably do this even if you weren't here. [audience laughter], obviously did do it, you know. Now this is something else again, I had no messages, if the media is the message, this is perhaps the most absolute demonstration you'll probably get. "Anger".
Robert Creeley
00:54:01
Reads "Anger" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
00:59:25
I'd like if people are feeling reasonably restless, I'd like to read one or two more poems and then one more story to make a selection frankly [unintelligible] I think I'll see what would be useful. A couple of shorter poems for the end. One called "A Tally".
Robert Creeley
01:00:01
Reads "A Tally" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
01:01:41
"Enough".
Robert Creeley
01:01:45
Reads "Enough" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
01:06:00
One last poem I want to read now, [unintelligible] "The Hole".
Robert Creeley
01:06:07
Reads "The Hole" [from Words].
Robert Creeley
01:07:53
Read a story that's in effect going back some time to the time of the writing of the Island, a novel. And I hadn't written any prose for some time, not since the middle 50's and I had a [joke (?)], myself and my wife and our four kids were all down in Guatemala
where I was tutoring children on a coffee plantation, and having that kind of isolation and time that seemed to, you know, have the possibility to try some prose. I like prose simply that it has--it's continuous, it permits a kind of variety of activity in ways that sometimes poetry from my own experience, at least in the way I'm given to write it, doesn't altogether- I mean, the emotional demand, let's say in a poem is in my own experience has known it, is of such order that alternatives in a curious way aren't possible, you simply say what you're thus brought to say as best you can. In prose, the emotional so called situation tends to be more various, it goes up, down, it ebbs, flows, re-forms, changes its mind, and so on and so forth, so I--not in recent years, I think the last prose I wrote was this novel, called the Island and I've not really written any since, that's about--when I was in Vancouver
teaching I finished that novel, and that was the last prose I think I've written and hopefully won't--I would like to go back to prose for a time. I'd like to have it open, I mean, again, this experience of being with these particular people, whenever habits become, oh let's say whenever you expect everything to be as you have experienced, it's time to look out or do something else because it means that you're assuming of the reality of your life has become too much of a pattern of a habit. Anyhow, this is a story called "The Book". I sort of like this story.
Robert Creeley
01:10:22
Reads "The Book".
Robert Creeley
01:21:15
Thank you very much for your...
Audience
01:21:16
Applause.
Introducer
01:21:39
I think I speak for everyone in thanking Robert Creeley for being able to come down and make the scene tonight. There are a couple of announcements that I want to make, the first one I can't remember so I'll have to [unintelligible], [Audrey Brunet (?)], that I do remember invites everyone to come to hear "Prayers on the Periphery", an original reading, this coming Monday, March the 6th at 8:30 pm in the little gallery on the mezzanine. Our next reading is a week from now, next Friday, March the 3rd, and Victor Coleman
and George Bowering
from Buffalo
and Toronto
will be coming. Thank you.
Audience
01:22:32
Applause.
Unknown
01:22:45
[Cut or edit made in tape].
Robert Creeley
01:22:48
Reads “The Book” [repeated from 00:27:43].
END
01:23:12
Notes:
Robert Creeley reads from For Love (Scribner, 1962) and Words (Scribner, 1967).
NOTES
Type:
General
Note:
Year-Specific Information:
Robert Creeley, tenured as a full professor at SUNY Buffalo in 1967, edited The New Writing in the USA with Don Allen, and published Words and The Charm: Early and Uncollected Poems. Creeley attended the London International Poetry Festival in July of 1967.
Type:
General
Note:
Local Connections:
Creeley had ties with Irving Layton through the Black Mountain Review in the 50’s. Creeley moved to Vancouver to work at the University of British Columbia in 1960-61. He had contacts with Phyllis Webb and Irving Layton. Creeley was George Bowering’s Master's thesis advisor at University of British Columbia until 1963, and wrote introductions for Bowering’s poetry[1]. He came to visit Montreal and Sir George Williams University the same year Layton was poet in residence, after years of correspondence.
Type:
Preservation
Note:
Reel-to-reel tape>2 CDs>digital file
Type:
General
Note:
Notes on item identifiers:
Irving Layton makes introductory speech, and it’s referred to in Irving’s reading, in 1967. I006-11-089.1 and I006-11-089.1-AC2 are from same reading. I006-11-089.2 is a separate reading.
Type:
Cataloguer
Note:
Original transcript, print catalogue, research, introduction and edits by Celyn Harding-Jones
Additional research and edits by Sarah McDonnell and Ali Barillaro
RELATED WORKS
Citation:
Creeley, Robert, and Penelope Creeley. The Collected Poems of Robert Creeley: 1945-1975. University of California Press, 2006.
Citation:
Creeley, Robert; Allen, Donald; Novik, Mary. Was That a Real Poem and Other Essays. Four Seasons Foundation, 1979.
Citation:
Creeley, Robert. Words: poems. New York: Scribner, 1967.
Citation:
Creeley, Robert. A Sense of Measure. Calder and Boyars, 1973.
Citation:
Creeley, Robert. Echoes. New Directions, 1994.
Citation:
Creeley, Robert. For Love: Poems Poems 1950-1960. New York: Scribner, 1962.
Citation:
Creeley, Robert. If I Were Writing This. New Directions, 2008.
Citation:
Creeley, Robert. Later. New Directions, 1980.
Citation:
Creeley, Robert. Life and Death. New Directions, 2000.
Citation:
Creeley, Robert. Mirrors. New Directions, 1983.
Citation:
Creeley, Robert. On Earth: Last Poems and an Essay. University of California Press, 2009.
Citation:
Creeley, Robert. Pieces. Scribner, 1969.
Citation:
Creeley, Robert. The Charm: Early and Uncollected Poems. Book People & Mudra, 1971.
Citation:
Creeley, Robert. The Gold Diggers. Divers Press, 1954.
Citation:
Creeley, Robert. Windows. Boyars, 1991.
Citation:
Fass, Ekbert. Robert Creeley: A Biography. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2001.
Citation:
“Poetry Series Coming Up At University”. Montreal: The Gazette. 31 December 1966, page 39.
Citation:
O’Reilly, Elizabeth. “Creeley, Robert, 1926-”. Literature Online Biography. Proquest, 2008.