Panel discussion: "Spicer in Context", Jack Spicer conference at New College of California with Larry Fagin, Lori Chamberlain, Ronald Silliman, and Michael Palmer on June 20, 1986 part 2 of 3 #394

CLASSIFICATION

Swallow ID:
5646
Partner Institution:
Simon Fraser University
Source Collection Label:
Reading in BC Collection
Sub Series:
Reading in BC Collection

ITEM DESCRIPTION

Title:
Panel discussion: "Spicer in Context", Jack Spicer conference at New College of California with Larry Fagin, Lori Chamberlain, Ronald Silliman, and Michael Palmer on June 20, 1986 part 2 of 3 #394
Title Source:
cassette and j-card
Language:
English
Production Context:
Documentary recording
Genre:
Speeches: Panels
Identifiers:
[]

Rights

Rights:
Copyright Not Evaluated (CNE)

CREATORS

Name:
Fagin, Larry
Dates:
1937-
Role:
"Speaker", "Reader"

Name:
Palmer, Michael
Dates:
1942-2013
Role:
"Speaker"
Notes:
Michael Palmer is the program's moderator

Name:
Blaser, Robin
Dates:
1925-2009
Role:
"Speaker"
Notes:
His part of speech is missing on side two

Name:
Chamberlain, Lori
Role:
"Speaker", "Reader"

Name:
Silliman, Ronald
Dates:
1946-
Role:
"Speaker", "Reader"

CONTRIBUTORS



MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Image:
Image
Recording Type:
Analogue
AV Type:
Audio
Material Designation:
Cassette
Physical Composition:
Magnetic Tape
Track Configuration:
2 track
Playback Mode:
Stereo
Sound Quality:
Good
Physical Condition:
Good
Other Physical Description:
Black and white clear jewel case with J card

DIGITAL FILE DESCRIPTION

Channel Field:
Stereo
Sample Rate:
44.1 kHz
Duration:
T00:47:03
Size:
43.5 MB
Bitrate:
32 bit
Encoding:
WAV for master files and .MP3 for online files

Channel Field:
Stereo
Sample Rate:
44.1 kHz
Duration:
T00:47:10
Size:
44.4 MB
Bitrate:
32 bit
Encoding:
WAV for master files and .MP3 for online files

Dates

Date:
1986-06-20
Type:
Production Date
Source:
J-card

LOCATION

Address:
San Francisco, California , United States
Venue:
New College of California
Latitude:
37.8667498
Longitude:
-122.2688401
Notes:
New College Berkley

CONTENT

Contents:
Side Track No. Comments One 004 Difference between Spicer Circle and Beat Circle Spicer Circle gay, preferred alcohol to drugs Interested in western rather than eastern philosophy 023 Dharma Society 050 Career and success – context for poets 080 Spicers poems – no completion – metonymic, engaging human contingency at every moment 137 Vampirish sensibility – creating a community of the dead 163 Spicer’s expression of connection of the living and the dead 183 Humour in Spicer – in order to open you up to something more sinister in its impact than it appears to be 212 Purpose of pun- engage in Hellish meanings 246 Spicer – anarchist – knew all the political distinctions chose not to participate Equated Ginsberg to Beatles A “slippage” in the human crisis 262 Joe Miles as a figure in Spicer’s and Duncan’s development 334 Discussion closed 350 Michael Palmer introduces discussion “Spicer’s vocabulary” “My vocabulary did this to me. Your love will let you go on’ Spicer’s last words to Blaser Offers some takes on the word vocabulary 435 Larry Fagin – reads poem from Harris Review from mid 70’s about Spicer 487 Talks about possession, territory, sexuality, etc. 520 The need to defeat dualism as the bottom line of the human condition 573 Vocabulary of gossip and baseball/pinball ritual 610 Tape over Two 000 Larry Fagin reads poems by Janey McKinnis 013 “I saw some Indians” 034 “You know who I am” 037 “The Janey tree” 047 Palmer introduces Lori Chamberlain 052 She says her interest grows from reading Spicer’s correspondence 064 Confusion between public and private address, a resemblance between poems and letters 072 His review of Dickenson’s letters. No distinction between poetry and prose “experiments in a heightened prose” 080 Spicer’s letters as part of his poetic project 091 What is in the letters – weather, racism, city life, etc. Remarks on poetic work. Letters as potential public documents. He measures their success by how he can be deeply personal and deeply public at the same time 152 Reads letter published in Caterpillar “Dear James” (James Alexander) 200 A dead letter – no addressee or address The letter as a metaphor 215 Serially of correspondence and serial poems 252 Ron Silliman introduced 290 Notes two sources – Clayton [Eshelman]* in Boundary 2 on After Lorca (notes sources of Spicer in particular Lorca poems. Good knowledge of Lorca) 301 Walter Benjamin (killed as a result of confrontation with fascists on the Spanish border) An article on the task of the translator 311 Reads “My vocabulary did this to me” Talks about Spicer’s Vancouver lecture “Words are nothing but low ghosts…you are stuck with language” 331 “Words are counters – the structure of language is a counter, an obstruction to what the poem wants to do” – insistence on the instrumental function of language – unlike Creeley and Duncan 372 Reads Spicer’s first published poem in Winter 1946 edition of Occident. “To the Semanticists” 380 Spicer divided his poetry into two periods – the later work beginning with After Lorca, 1957. (conception of serial poem and the book as a unit of writing) 398 Reads from the sixth letter “Most of my friends like words too well” “The perfect poem has an infinitely small vocabulary” 444 Talks about “The diamond” as a vortex 475 “These poems are not translations” but Spicer’s poetics are fundamentally of translation 490 Steps of poetic maturity – Vancouver talks 533 Walter Benjamin – Kinship to Spicer’s poetic of dictation 564 Translation – “can carry across” only intention and “translatability” – Benjamin’s words 604 Translation in one tongue becomes diction in another language 612 Tape ends
Notes:
SFU BC Readings formatting

NOTES


RELATED WORKS